From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 449143B29E for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 20:40:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.69]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797D913C05B; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:40:38 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang To: "Gary E. Miller" cc: Dave Taht via Starlink In-Reply-To: <20220713173602.0582c9b3@spidey.rellim.com> Message-ID: References: <20220713173602.0582c9b3@spidey.rellim.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="===============4701182666964541814==" Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink at sea X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:40:39 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --===============4701182666964541814== Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII it all depends on what you are comparing it to. This isn't designed for a 30 ft boat, but rather for commercial operations. SpaceX had talked about how this replaces the earlier satellite services they have had on their boats that were unreliable and cost >$150k/month with much better service listing for <$50k/month (for all their boats) This is designed to be an all-weather allways-on service, most boaters could just use a standard starlink RV setup and put it out when they need it (taking it down when the weather is poor) David Lang On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Gary E. Miller via Starlink wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:36:02 -0700 > From: Gary E. Miller via Starlink > Reply-To: Gary E. Miller > To: Dave Taht via Starlink > Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink at sea > > Yo Dave! > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:20:43 -0700 > Dave Taht via Starlink wrote: > >> https://www.royalcaribbeanblog.com/2022/06/28/i-tried-elon-musks-starlink-internet-royal-caribbean-cruise-ship > > > Did you notice the eye popping cost? > > https://www.starlink.com/maritime > > "High-speed, low-latency internet with up to 350 Mbps download while at > sea. $5,000/mo with a one-time hardware cost of $10,000 for two high > performance terminals." > > I know a bunch of yacthies that have been waiting for this, but are > now > disappointed. > > RGDS > GARY > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 > gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 > > Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? > "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin > --===============4701182666964541814== Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <412o1r94-s370-q90-n60-q884439n5131@ynat.uz> Content-Description: Content-Disposition: INLINE X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KU3Rhcmxpbmsg bWFpbGluZyBsaXN0ClN0YXJsaW5rQGxpc3RzLmJ1ZmZlcmJsb2F0Lm5ldApodHRwczovL2xpc3Rz LmJ1ZmZlcmJsb2F0Lm5ldC9saXN0aW5mby9zdGFybGluawo= --===============4701182666964541814==--