From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f171.google.com (mail-gx0-f171.google.com [209.85.161.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37833200830 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ggcs5 with SMTP id s5so4803307ggc.16 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:40:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7Dcr6kRbJ19/uVJaIEaXeB269tpqpvpflUtIkoz1C4I=; b=qdFvQHlQdDVDQGJrM+IjwzXO/Vo4zQszZGfwYRLWkIlSgRKGXIH6FJc9XUQ3D1X11N /irjjRLL6mMfiAc4eQgSqRVkIleC6GQtNdGPYLW5nDM21IHb1ANZKjyCP2a9p6ptV48u xA2R8QxYUb+HEfFcLd6CvOPZH8BvFun5+o/AMKyXOhpJle72+T/cila/XrON6+KH3d9z AxB90sYsgsFrYStfx3gSPBHax674obM61q6y/T8rWAchWH8UUg51kVMhKmzhjL1sn9nJ 6fdDBAQPOg2DrS5AlPjeeHiKLNeTcdkGc8RajaejWMP0c5qk36XQ7Y7f6mpg7418CrQO +lcw== Received: by 10.60.14.4 with SMTP id l4mr6279820oec.39.1331588431152; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:40:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tz2026@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.68.164 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:40:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120312210345.GC17357@thyrsus.com> <20120312212608.GC17895@thyrsus.com> From: tz Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:40:11 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Df_r_gqAJBRwNGYiuBGFKwqSvb8 Message-ID: To: Patrick Maupin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: thumbgps-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Thumbgps-devel] Build vs. modify vs. what should we be doing anyway? X-BeenThere: thumbgps-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:40:32 -0000 I can't find a datasheet with the pinout for the 8 pin PL2303. You would need 4 lines for the USB, plus TX and RX. It would depend what the other two pins are. On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Patrick Maupin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: >> Crap. =A0Well, there goes that idea then. =A0Or are there procedures for >> reverse-engineering a multilayer board? > > There's nothing to reverse engineer on that board. =A0It speaks for > itself. =A0Take a look at the picture :-)