From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pz0-f43.google.com (mail-pz0-f43.google.com [209.85.210.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C207D2011CD for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by damc16 with SMTP id c16so127953dam.16 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:04:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KcmNKRyJELkCW0NBGcVuzFitjGhbHSWieLyn5xKmnDE=; b=HF+KHYfIi0qBaLb23XmwW/jisHp0LoMN2LSGpKaQ9uWlOcV/N7RuEwFqpLeXDVPJDx woi/h0P94kl+LXYzmlBidq1EVzP6cCeRGmKGAwr5DePQ4w6lN5oNN1uHWGgjqi8Iov+J e+7Is+mqXomInvWbtQHuc/eOoXrr0lWVH+pCnlx40NZxudtqkkQNVJgJavAUIQWaZyho OggxYuBE8+O4007dXlTGp+fdPMUh1DidnCQ9R8utT6iv4t54IjoLDEx8ts01ljVYGN3I 7sQACtMqcgdpB16mX7WjAwtx03v3S1BypmHa4yj2/ODBqx6BXEfhesKDh0CRxgWSNSzG qk8g== Received: by 10.68.131.67 with SMTP id ok3mr13940146pbb.161.1331604298166; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:04:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.241.169 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:04:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120313014341.GC18695@thyrsus.com> References: <20120312210345.GC17357@thyrsus.com> <20120312212608.GC17895@thyrsus.com> <20120312213946.GE17895@thyrsus.com> <20120312224546.GA18404@thyrsus.com> <20120313014341.GC18695@thyrsus.com> From: Chris Kuethe Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:04:38 -0700 Message-ID: To: esr@thyrsus.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: thumbgps-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Thumbgps-devel] Build vs. modify vs. what should we be doing anyway? X-BeenThere: thumbgps-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:04:58 -0000 On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 18:43, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > I agree. =A0For years I've thought it was silly that SiRF or somebody > else hasn't designed a direct-to-USB GPS chip. =A0Such an obvious next > step considering how obsolete RS232 is becoming - they could reduce > parts count drastically *and* claim a larger share of end-product BOM > for a double win. ublox antaris4 (and probably everything newer) has on-die usb and implements the abstract modem class. but 1PPS isn't transmitted over usb. --=20 GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?