From: Patrick Maupin <pmaupin@gmail.com>
To: tz <thomas@mich.com>
Cc: thumbgps-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Thumbgps-devel] Build vs. modify vs. what should we be doing anyway?
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:27:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPz3yKeiZbSPLF+L1n7YQtNkUB_1NVGwZSs-wzdRP-n_tPZ9Hw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFv7OigwG=YhXbg1Jek=nP=uLhxh4Xpt0gOjLowJY0sVjxZkOA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:18 PM, tz <thomas@mich.com> wrote:
> The board is probably minimum 4 layer.
The main board could easily be 2 layers, because the GPS is done in a
surface mount module that mounts on the main board. Pictures here:
http://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=80&topicid=60005
> The prolific is 28 pin ssop with scattered power and ground pins.
There's apparently an 8 pin variant -- check the picture...
> GPS chips (except for highly integrated modules) are worse as far as
> the pins you need to get to the right places.
Right -- you ought to be able to use modules for this quantity.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-12 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-10 18:02 Patrick Maupin
2012-03-12 21:03 ` Eric S. Raymond
2012-03-12 21:18 ` tz
2012-03-12 21:26 ` Eric S. Raymond
2012-03-12 21:28 ` Patrick Maupin
2012-03-12 21:39 ` Eric S. Raymond
2012-03-12 22:10 ` Patrick Maupin
2012-03-12 22:23 ` tz
2012-03-12 22:33 ` Patrick Maupin
2012-03-13 2:29 ` Ron Frazier (NTP)
2012-03-13 2:39 ` Chris Kuethe
2012-03-12 22:45 ` Eric S. Raymond
2012-03-12 23:01 ` Dave Taht
2012-03-13 1:43 ` Eric S. Raymond
2012-03-13 2:04 ` Chris Kuethe
2012-03-13 2:13 ` Eric S. Raymond
2012-03-13 2:40 ` Dave Taht
2012-03-13 2:53 ` Chris Kuethe
2012-03-13 4:54 ` Eric S. Raymond
2012-03-13 13:23 ` Dave Taht
2012-03-13 14:35 ` tz
2012-03-13 16:04 ` Eric S. Raymond
2012-03-13 16:22 ` tz
2012-03-13 2:38 ` Ron Frazier (NTP)
2012-03-13 2:42 ` Chris Kuethe
2012-03-13 3:00 ` Ron Frazier (NTP)
2012-03-13 3:04 ` Dave Taht
2012-03-13 3:06 ` Chris Kuethe
2012-03-13 3:16 ` Dave Taht
2012-03-13 3:31 ` Chris Kuethe
2012-03-13 4:49 ` Dave Taht
2012-03-13 4:55 ` Eric S. Raymond
2012-03-13 4:16 ` Eric S. Raymond
2012-03-12 21:40 ` tz
2012-03-12 21:27 ` Patrick Maupin [this message]
2012-03-12 21:22 ` Patrick Maupin
2012-03-12 21:37 ` Eric S. Raymond
2012-03-12 21:45 ` Patrick Maupin
2012-03-12 22:02 ` Eric S. Raymond
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPz3yKeiZbSPLF+L1n7YQtNkUB_1NVGwZSs-wzdRP-n_tPZ9Hw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pmaupin@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas@mich.com \
--cc=thumbgps-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox