From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vx0-f171.google.com (mail-vx0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FBC6200627 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vcbfl15 with SMTP id fl15so8731535vcb.16 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:28:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qaPiW5l1QKNdwdoOpDTUMKiJwSYqF8h5HGqmY7wwVlY=; b=dvEMd2/ruZs+xIadnfhqGmPmkcVvLZolsns6ESFSqSaQ9Em72bR3qANntoP+ZFllf3 bzNgO0nk6tNfcYcGmcG1i9b94ezhKuMyAm5jhzpg0TZj37M1Hw4QhHKb9zvy2PfP+JUp d2TkLiya/ggE8RSEae6u6cxydELspQcVfRDIEqJ1zGTHrGKr/JLBpuMELGR2DLpWh6v3 cyGs6WIG3lqeTfOwzRsastG8BZw2fj4gAbitWj1rG0MuEcnAmugJwFs3bKRedE/mseWI JRG5DpxtrLOBo3t65P9dsa6/+hGNwAcBJltjc1QY7PJF/qoTNSAh9Pfoza96bhA1jeFe NHLg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.93.138 with SMTP id cu10mr15557223vdb.86.1331587728040; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.140.132 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:28:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120312212608.GC17895@thyrsus.com> References: <20120312210345.GC17357@thyrsus.com> <20120312212608.GC17895@thyrsus.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:28:48 -0500 Message-ID: From: Patrick Maupin To: esr@thyrsus.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: thumbgps-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Thumbgps-devel] Build vs. modify vs. what should we be doing anyway? X-BeenThere: thumbgps-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:28:49 -0000 On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Crap. =A0Well, there goes that idea then. =A0Or are there procedures for > reverse-engineering a multilayer board? There's nothing to reverse engineer on that board. It speaks for itself. Take a look at the picture :-)