[Bismark-devel] repo locations + source code license?
Walter de Donato
walter.dedonato at unina.it
Tue May 31 11:39:14 EDT 2011
I think so...
I'm currently setting up everything to start importing the Bismark
repository.
2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster at cc.gatech.edu>
> Do you have access to the "bismark-devel" user on github?
>
> On May 31, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
>
> > Sold! :-)
> >
> >
> > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster at cc.gatech.edu>
> > Yes. "bismark-firmware" (singular) seems good.
> >
> > On May 31, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
> >
> > > Why don't bismark-firmwares?
> > >
> > > Walter
> > >
> > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster at cc.gatech.edu>
> > > Yes, I think perhaps bismark builds could be kept in a separate repo.
> > >
> > > Not sure what we could call that one. bismark-router?
> > >
> > > -Nick
> > >
> > > On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Walter de Donato wrote:
> > >
> > > > I usually feel comfortable using GPL licenses.
> > > > I don't know if in this case choosing the Affero GPL would be more
> appropriate.
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > I can try to migrate Bismark to github if Dave didn't start yet doing
> it.
> > > > Probably Bismark builds should be kept apart from it. Ideas?
> > > >
> > > > Walter
> > > >
> > > > 2011/5/31 Nick Feamster <feamster at cc.gatech.edu>
> > > > for the FCC writeup, the requirements are that the source code is
> publicly available.
> > > >
> > > > "Any new or improved app must be openly licensed (i.e., open source)
> and any non-personally identifiable data collected through the software tool
> must be made available, upon request, to the public for independent
> analysis."
> > > >
> > > > 1. What license are we going to use?
> > > >
> > > > 2. Should we move to github.com today? I am happy to try to migrate
> the network dashboard code into there. What about: (1) the BISMark firmware
> build; (2) BISMark?
> > > >
> > > > For the firmware and management software, I'm actually not sure if
> the repositories are currently public?
> > > >
> > > > How should we handle this issue?
> > > >
> > > > -Nick
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Bismark-devel mailing list
> > > > Bismark-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bismark-devel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Walter de Donato, PhD Student
> > > > Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
> > > > Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
> > > > Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
> > > > Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
> > > > Email: walter.dedonato at unina.it
> > > > WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
Walter de Donato, PhD Student
Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica
Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy)
Phone: +39 081 76 83821 - Fax: +39 081 76 83816
Email: walter.dedonato at unina.it
WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/walter.dedonato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bismark-devel/attachments/20110531/1510c4f3/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Bismark-devel
mailing list