[Bloat] Progress with latency-under-load tool

[Dave Täht]

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com> writes:

> On 21 Mar, 2011, at 12:47 am, Dave Täht wrote:
>
>>> The interesting outlier thus far is 8... I'm tempted to stop the test
>>> now and recompile for testing 3 u/l 3 d/l first....
>> 
>> Scenario 12: 2 uploads, 2 downloads... 4725 KiB/s up, 3645 KiB/s
>> down, 0.81 Hz smoothness
>> 
>> ... Still running tests ...
>
> I should probably explain what the scenarios are.
>
> Every combination of up/down flows is tried for each of 1, 2, 3, 4
> total flows.  That's 14 scenarios covering basic downloading and
> uploading through to heavy whole-family use.
>
> Then I jump ahead to 32 flows, with 32/0, 31/1, 16/16, 1/31, 0/32
> splits, to simulate BitTorrent style traffic.
>
> Total 19 scenarios.

I'll still argue that starting with the worst case scenarios and working
down would be best... 3/3 perhaps

Scenario 12: 2 uploads, 2 downloads... 4725 KiB/s up, 3645 KiB/s down, 0.81 Hz smoothness
Scenario 13: 3 uploads, 1 downloads... 4917 KiB/s up, 3175 KiB/s down, 0.59 Hz smoothness


>
>  - Jonathan
>

-- 
Dave Taht
http://nex-6.taht.net