[Bloat] Progress with latency-under-load tool

[Dave Täht]

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com> writes:

> On 21 Mar, 2011, at 12:47 am, Dave Täht wrote:
>
>>> The interesting outlier thus far is 8... I'm tempted to stop the test
>>> now and recompile for testing 3 u/l 3 d/l first....


I found the cause of the outlier, the arm box had a hiccough on its
hard disk controller for some reason around then. Or at least that
appears to be the case, but judging from this:

Scenario 16: 1 uploads, 31 downloads... 4401 KiB/s up, 4111 KiB/s down, 0.59 Hz smoothness
Scenario 17: 16 uploads, 16 downloads... 6108 KiB/s up, 2103 KiB/s down,
0.00 Hz smoothness

Maybe not.

Me thinks we need 3 digits of precision here.



-- 
Dave Taht
http://nex-6.taht.net