[Bloat] [aqm] [iccrg] AQM deployment status?
naeem.khademi at gmail.com
Wed Sep 25 15:19:39 EDT 2013
Although interesting to know that (W)RED has made it into some hardware (in
your RE to Lars' point), my question is more about "deployment" at the edge
or the core, whether it's being used or not?
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Akhtar, Shahid (Shahid) <
shahid.akhtar at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> Hi Steinar and Lars,
> Please see below examples of support for RED/WRED from switches (from ALU
> and Cisco websites, search for RED or WRED in document):
> ALU 7450:
> ALU Omniswitch:
> Cisco Catalyst 6000/6500:
> Cisco Catalyst 4500:
> Best regards,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steinar H. Gunderson [mailto:sgunderson at bigfoot.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:35 AM
> To: Eggert, Lars
> Cc: Akhtar, Shahid (Shahid); bloat; iccrg at irtf.org; aqm at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Bloat] [iccrg] [aqm] AQM deployment status?
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:31:21PM +0000, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> >> Most routers/switches/access equipment support RFC 2309, which is a
> >> description of RED.
> > I've heard that statement from many different people. I wonder if it
> > is actually true. Is there any hard data on this?
> I don't have hard data, but my soft data is that generally, devices
> branded as switches (including L3 switches) do not support it. Routers
> /* Steinar */
> Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
> aqm mailing list
> aqm at ietf.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bloat