[Bloat] New speedtest with bufferbloat indicators (from DSLreports)

[jb]

Oh, and if you are trying to reach the local speedtest.net speed, but
select 4g, it is defaulting to 3 streams, and then only 1 up because of the
old Firefox version,
and is using servers in Netherlands and Germany.

So if you try a current version of Firefox and/or Chrome, and want to push
it,
change in preferences streams down to 6 and streams up to 2 - 4


On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:57 PM, jb <justin at dslr.net> wrote:

> Regarding
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/380810
>
> The upload graph was broken, or partially so, because you're using
> Firefox/24.0 which dates from 2014 and apparently doesn't know how to
> feedback information on the upload so the measurement was done from each
> upload as it finished
>
> So that is why the upload graph is no good, but the upload number is about
> right.
>
> Also it did have stalls and drops but not too bad, not enough to trigger
> an error.
>   46.98s 10hz drop stats frames=15 total ms=3985
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:03:48 +0300 Marko Myllynen <myllynen at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On 2015-04-28 09:55, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Finally, there is a easy-to-use browser based speedtest that also
>> > > measures bufferbloat:
>> > >
>> > >  http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest
>> > >
>> > > After you run the test, click the green "Results + Share" button to
>> see
>> > > more detailed information.  Which will contain a graph with "Ping
>> > > response under load", which will indicate if you have bufferbloat on
>> > > your link.
>> >
>> > FWIW, my results using RHEL 6 + Lenovo T420s + 4G modem:
>>
>> Thanks - I'm surprised to see how well 4G handles this.  I was
>> expecting to see higher delays under load.
>>
>> > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/380810
>>
>> The upload graph looks a little strange.
>>
>> > http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/4322094820
>> >
>> > Speedtest has servers in Finland so that might explain a bit. I was
>> > running two Fedora guest installations in the background during the
>> > tests so the system was rather busy.
>>
>> Could you try to run this in a Chrome browser?
>> The author (Cc'ed) sayed Firefox on Linux is too slow...
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>   Jesper Dangaard Brouer
>>   MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
>>   Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
>>   LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20150428/df856e28/attachment-0003.html>