[Bloat] [rmcat] webrtc vs aqm and/or sfq

[Ingemar Johansson S]

Hi

For what it is worth, ECN handling is described for SCReAM since a while back. 
It is however not yet implemented in the code at (https://github.com/EricssonResearch/scream ), this is however a quite easy task to do and if the interest in SCReAM picks up then I am happy to spend the 2-3 hours that it takes to add ECN support to the code.

/Ingemar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Täht [mailto:dave at taht.net]
> Sent: den 26 augusti 2016 08:15
> To: aqm at ietf.org; rmcat at ietf.org; bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> Subject: [rmcat] webrtc vs aqm and/or sfq
> 
> Pretty good paper at:
> 
> http://c3lab.poliba.it/images/0/0e/Gcc_aqm.pdf
> 
> I do keep hoping the videoconferencing folk give ecn a shot one day,
> especially for iframes. Has anyone pursued the early line of work for ecn that
> was in nada, or tried to add it to gcc?
> 
> Another hope is that we see more videoconferencing analyses on wifi and at
> higher baseline rates than 2mbit.
>