[Bloat] geoff huston's take on BBR

[Matthias Tafelmeier]

On 06/12/2018 02:42 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> https://ripe76.ripe.net/presentations/10-2018-05-15-bbr.pdf
> "More research needed". Naturally ;)
>
> (But yeah, good points overall)

Interesting. Potentially, all affectuated. After having applied the BBR
2.0, we might are back to Cubic? :D

Moreover, if it tends to be unstable on larger scale - what is Google
doing then? Thought they've got a more or less homogeneous BBR driven
TCP flow ecosystem - at least internally!? Was all propaganda? When
speculating, might working for them since of centrally handled flow
steering approaches - "imposing inter-flow fairness".

-- 

Besten Gruß

Matthias Tafelmeier

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20180612/d3dfcf79/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xE0164F5B8ADF343B.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 5167 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20180612/d3dfcf79/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20180612/d3dfcf79/attachment.sig>