[Bloat] The "Some Congestion Experienced" ECN codepoint - a new internet draft -

[Mikael Abrahamsson]

On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Jonathan Morton wrote:

>> On 11 Mar, 2019, at 11:07 am, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
>>
>> Well, I am not convinced blowing the last codepoint on SCE has enough merit.
>
> I will make a stronger statement: I am convinced that blowing the last codepoint on L4S does *not* have enough merit.

... and I believe that blowing it on SCE doesn't have merit either.

That's the entire thing why I am opposing the use of ECT(1) unless we're 
*really* *really* *really* sure there is something we want to blow it on.

Using it for SCE for me is marginal benefit compared to what ECT(1) could 
be used for either. I think L4S is proposing enough novelty that it could 
be used for that, but I'm open for other suggestions. SCE isn't enough.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se