[Bloat] Multiple WAN ports & SQM?

[Dave Taht]

not huge on bonding, simpler to just get the two uplinks and split
flows across them with an sqm instance for each and a tc hash
directing flows at one or another.

On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:30 AM Daniel Sterling
<sterling.daniel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When I had both DSL and cable modem, I compiled Linux with this patch set to make multi gateway NAT work and it worked great
>
> http://ja.ssi.bg/#routes
>
> Should be able to use that plus ifb+cake on each NIC to do the right thing, aye?
>
> As an aside, I'm kind of furious that NAT fix never got merged upstream :( it's so useful for multiple uplinks
>
> -- Dan
>
> On May 3, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Rich Brown <richb.hanover at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL, max of 15mbps/1mbps), I wonder if we could improve things by getting a second connection from our ISP and "bonding" the two links together in my OpenWrt router.
>
> I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3.
>
> But neither would seem to offer the kinds of latency control (SQM/fq_codel/cake) that the cool kids in networking have come to expect.
>
> Any recommendations from this group for such an effort? Thanks.
>
> Rich
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat



-- 
Make Music, Not War

Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-435-0729