[Bloat] waveform bufferbloat test is GOOOD

[Sina Khanifar]

Hi all,

It's funny that this thread should pop up now … I  drafted a long
email to send to the list two nights ago. I was planning to announce
that we were almost ready to actually launch our updated bufferbloat
test, but then we found some pesky bugs that we're now working to
squash.

We should have them all sorted out this week or early next week, and
I'll finally send my longer email to the group that covers all the
changes we made since we shared an early beta a couple of months back.

Best,

Sina.

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 1:42 AM Sebastian Moeller <moeller0 at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
>
> I wonder what is going on with the reported latencies. I see negative latency numbers indicating that the report is presenting a difference, maybe unloaded minus the direction under tests? My tests with SQM also report the unloaded latency figure ion the top right as 0ms (while my link forces A >=12ms RTT to the first IP address after my router). I would guess that there is still some development going on and hopefully that will be fixed.
>
> Best Regards
>         Sebastian
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 2021, at 17:27, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Regrettably my joy only lasted a few hours, as there was confirmation
> > bias. Try it with sqm off or on. Running a complete battery of tests
> > now.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:55 AM Jonathan Foulkes <jf at jonathanfoulkes.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Excellent, nice to see another comprehensive test.
> >> I also like that they list the IQrouter in the set of routers that mitigate bloat ;-)
> >>
> >> Since I recently shared the DSLreports test from my line, here is the same line tested via this new site:
> >> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=f10cfe50-6dd2-4ae3-9b40-dedd2b5087c6
> >>
> >> Nice to see that A+ and zeros for bloat.
> >>
> >> for reference, the dslreports test: https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/67140120
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >> On Feb 1, 2021, at 10:33 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=bea9f548-086a-4a74-bbde-b05b33f689a2
> >>
> >> I am very happy with this test, and I must admit, if it was discussed
> >> here, already, I must have missed the thread. Not only is the test
> >> well structured and fast - and some people like whisker plots more
> >> than me, my blessed cdfs, & the FAQ is brilliant.
> >>
> >> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat#erid5407983
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
> >> relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
> >>
> >> dave at taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bloat mailing list
> >> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
> > relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
> >
> > dave at taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bloat mailing list
> > Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat