[Bloat] [EXTERNAL] Re: "Very interesting L4S presentation from Nokia Bell Labs on tap for RIPE 88 in Krakow this week! "

[Livingood, Jason]

> I don't dispute that, at least insofar as the metrics you prefer for such comparisons, under the network conditions you also prefer. But by omitting the conventional AQM results from the performance charts, the comparison presented to readers is not between L4S and the current state of the art, and the expected benefit is therefore exaggerated in a misleading way.

[JL] That is good feedback for you to send to Nokia. But as I mentioned, all our comparisons in lab and field testing are of AQM vs L4S - so we have that covered (and lots of other tests cases I won't cover here).