[Cake] openwrt build with latest cake and other qdiscs

[Dave Taht]

no, that is not how cake works. I think.

On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0 at gmx.de> wrote:
> HI Alan,
>
> I believe we got side tracked while discussing cake’s atm adaptation layer, but with a bit of luck you could use tc’s stab option to add the overhead and leave the atm encapsulation to cake (which does a better job than stab). If you could try and report back that would be helpful. I am a bit in a hurry, but will have more time next week to help out if need be…
>
>
> Best Regards
>         Sebastian
>
> On May 10, 2015, at 19:29 , Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi again
>>
>> I tested Dave's build of cake on wndr3800.  (Didn't try specifying cake2/cake3; I'm guessing tc cake means cake3 on there).  "atm" adjustment worked fine on my adsl.  I can't distinguish it from sqm-scripts with the same configuration.
>>
>> SQM seems to win from having "overhead 40", which I can't configure in cake.
>>
>>
>> up / kbit/s
>> down / kbit/s
>> overhead / bytes
>> Median RRUL / ms
>> SQM
>> 16000
>> 950
>> 0
>> 74
>> Cake
>> 17175
>> 995
>> 0
>> 76
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cake
>> 16000
>> 950
>> 0
>> 74
>> SQM
>> 17175
>> 995
>> 40
>> 70
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> DSL sync rate
>> 17619
>> 1020
>>
>> 59
>>
>> IMO it wouldn't hurt for 'tc atm', 'tc adsl', and everything else to default to 'overhead 44'.  (The highest overhead Seb reported; the original worst case overhead[1] plus a vlan header for IPTV).
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> [1] http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/tc/tc-atm/#usage
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cake mailing list
>> Cake at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake



-- 
Dave Täht
Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67