[Cake] Fwd: ieee vs ietf stds for dscp mappings

Dave Taht dave.taht at gmail.com
Tue Nov 17 04:58:02 EST 2015


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Fred Baker (fred) <fred at cisco.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:57 AM
Subject: Fwd: [Cake] ieee vs ietf stds for dscp mappings
To: "Tim Szigeti (szigeti)" <szigeti at cisco.com>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>


I'm noting that there is no reference to RFC 4594/5127 in any of this
chart, or the RFCs it is based on.

> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
> Subject: Fwd: [Cake] ieee vs ietf stds for dscp mappings
> Date: November 15, 2015 at 4:35:50 AM PST
> To: Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>
>
> Yer killing me. I have no idea how to cope with this mess of diffserv
> values. See
> attached.
>
> arded message ----------
> From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 2:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [Cake] ieee vs ietf stds for dscp mappings
> To: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
> Cc: cake at lists.bufferbloat.net
>
>
>
>> On 14 Nov, 2015, at 14:43, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Just to keep confusing matters
>
> Yeah, Diffserv is a complete and utter mess, isn’t it?
>
>
>
> - Jonathan Morton
-------------- next part --------------
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 39667 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/attachments/20151117/e34e4d38/attachment-0002.pdf>


More information about the Cake mailing list