[Cake] cake vs fq_codel

[Benjamin Cronce]

fq_Codel is still useful if you need a traffic shaper with bandwidth
controls, like HFS. Maybe fq_Codel could be updated with "ways" like Cake,
to remove hash collisions.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> > On 19 Nov, 2015, at 11:17, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > A) Under what circumstances is cake a replacement for fq_codel?
>
> When shaping or Diffserv prioritisation is required, or when flow hash
> collisions are likely to be problematic.
>
> > B) When is fq_codel a better choice than cake?
>
> When none of the above apply, and a slight improvement in CPU and memory
> overhead is desirable.
>
>  - Jonathan Morton
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/attachments/20151120/a2c763b2/attachment-0002.html>