[Cake] cake vs fq_codel
bcronce at gmail.com
Fri Nov 20 21:37:30 EST 2015
fq_Codel is still useful if you need a traffic shaper with bandwidth
controls, like HFS. Maybe fq_Codel could be updated with "ways" like Cake,
to remove hash collisions.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com>
> > On 19 Nov, 2015, at 11:17, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> > A) Under what circumstances is cake a replacement for fq_codel?
> When shaping or Diffserv prioritisation is required, or when flow hash
> collisions are likely to be problematic.
> > B) When is fq_codel a better choice than cake?
> When none of the above apply, and a slight improvement in CPU and memory
> overhead is desirable.
> - Jonathan Morton
> Cake mailing list
> Cake at lists.bufferbloat.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cake