[Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100

[Alan Jenkins]

On 16/11/17 09:24, Pete Heist wrote:
>
>> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com <mailto:dave.taht at gmail.com>>
>> To: Cake List <cake at lists.bufferbloat.net 
>> <mailto:cake at lists.bufferbloat.net>>
>> Subject: Re: [Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAA93jw7sxna2Ot=Q86LaTGN+2z2Y=NzdV2-EcqU6ypkc6=DbTw at mail.gmail.com 
>> <mailto:CAA93jw7sxna2Ot=Q86LaTGN+2z2Y=NzdV2-EcqU6ypkc6=DbTw at mail.gmail.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> This is a much saner test result[1], showing about a 20% improvement
>> under the rrul_be test. I scaled back the topology to two instances of
>> cake on the middlebox, shaping to 100mbits on one side and 10mbits on
>> the other, and flipped filtering on or off. The win will improve more
>> with upload/download ratios of ever worse than 10/1, and the rrul is
>> not exactly a test of real traffic.
>>
>> What other ratios are out there, particularly in the dsl world?
>
> That’s quite nice. Attached is the ADSL connection info for what I had 
> before I found FreeNet. I don’t miss this connection at all, _except_ 
> that it might have been nice for testing this. 2048 / 135 kbit, that’s 
> around 15 : 1.

I have a good UK ADSL2+ connection, which I am shaping at 15:0.9 mbit, 
using a LEDE box.  The raw sync rates are a bit more asymmetric too.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/attachments/20171116/92ad6388/attachment.html>