[Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100
alan.christopher.jenkins at gmail.com
Thu Nov 16 07:47:41 EST 2017
On 16/11/17 09:24, Pete Heist wrote:
>> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com <mailto:dave.taht at gmail.com>>
>> To: Cake List <cake at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> <mailto:cake at lists.bufferbloat.net>>
>> Subject: Re: [Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100
>> <CAA93jw7sxna2Ot=Q86LaTGN+2z2Y=NzdV2-EcqU6ypkc6=DbTw at mail.gmail.com
>> <mailto:CAA93jw7sxna2Ot=Q86LaTGN+2z2Y=NzdV2-EcqU6ypkc6=DbTw at mail.gmail.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> This is a much saner test result, showing about a 20% improvement
>> under the rrul_be test. I scaled back the topology to two instances of
>> cake on the middlebox, shaping to 100mbits on one side and 10mbits on
>> the other, and flipped filtering on or off. The win will improve more
>> with upload/download ratios of ever worse than 10/1, and the rrul is
>> not exactly a test of real traffic.
>> What other ratios are out there, particularly in the dsl world?
> That’s quite nice. Attached is the ADSL connection info for what I had
> before I found FreeNet. I don’t miss this connection at all, _except_
> that it might have been nice for testing this. 2048 / 135 kbit, that’s
> around 15 : 1.
I have a good UK ADSL2+ connection, which I am shaping at 15:0.9 mbit,
using a LEDE box. The raw sync rates are a bit more asymmetric too.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cake