[Cake] A few puzzling Cake results

Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant kevin at darbyshire-bryant.me.uk
Wed Apr 18 14:16:20 EDT 2018

> On 18 Apr 2018, at 19:11, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk> wrote:
> Jonas Mårtensson <martensson.jonas at gmail.com> writes:
>> Dave, in the thread referenced earlier that led to this change you said:
>> "The loss of throughput here compared to non-ingress mode is a blocker for
>> mainlining and for that matter, wedging this into lede."
>> I'm curious, what would the latency be in Toke's experiment with
>> non-ingress mode and with the 4 MTU change reverted? The same as for
>> fq_codel?
> Yeah, I'm planning to run some more tests with and without ingress mode
> and with and without the target scaling. Just need to finish writing up
> the paper on Cake first; there's a deadline looming on Friday…

I know this can be writted betterrer but I think this is the sort of thing we’re pondering over?


Warning: compiles, not yet actually run in any way whatsoever ;-)


Kevin D-B

012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775  9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/attachments/20180418/110d8191/attachment.sig>

More information about the Cake mailing list