[Cerowrt-devel] closer ties to ltsi?
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Fri Mar 2 10:43:02 EST 2012
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:33:25AM -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
> Dear Greg:
> What ltsi is up to:
> is orthogonal to what we are up to, in that they are trying to produce
> a usable, stable tree that can be used in a lot of CE devices, and we
> are trying to push the bleeding edge in finding, fixing, and testing
> things that would be good to have deployed in a lot of CE devices at
> least on the bufferbloat, security, and network - especially ipv6 -
> How to faster get stuff from "R&D" to deployment is always on my mind.
> I'm very happy to be successfully tracking the 3.3 process 'live' at
> the moment with cerowrt. I imagine the next 'stable'
> kernel chosen will be 3.3 or 3.4 based.
If you do all of your work upstream in the main kernel.org kernel, then
LTSI can backport your changes as needed to their kernels. I recommend
best of luck,
More information about the Cerowrt-devel