[Cerowrt-devel] Testing 3.10.24-8

[Dave Taht]

Is  there an unshaped version in there for reference?
On Dec 25, 2013 3:02 PM, "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke at toke.dk> wrote:

> Flashed 3.10.24-8 and ran a bunch of tests against it on my VDSL line.
> All the data is here:
>
> http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/cerowrt-3.10.24-8/
>
> which documents my tests of several different speed settings for the SQM
> scripts. Ended up sticking with 46000/9800 Kbit/s corresponding to these
> plots:
>
>
> http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/cerowrt-3.10.24-8/rrul-2013-12-25T232954.622558.3_10_24_8_46000_9800_ethernet_overhead_0_simplest_.json.gz_all_scaled.svg
>
> http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/cerowrt-3.10.24-8/rrul-2013-12-25T232954.622558.3_10_24_8_46000_9800_ethernet_overhead_0_simplest_.json.gz_ping_cdf.svg
>
> http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/cerowrt-3.10.24-8/rrul-2013-12-25T232954.622558.3_10_24_8_46000_9800_ethernet_overhead_0_simplest_.json.gz_totals.svg
>
> I ran some tests over wifi, which mostly just show that my laptop's wifi
> chipset sucks. Didn't manage to get any TX dma errors, though.
>
>
> Oh, and I got rid of the fixdaemons script in my own build and haven't
> had any trouble getting dnsmasq to come up, nor have I seen other averse
> effects.
>
> Also, I fixed the sysupgrade script and pushed the change to git, so
> next time Dave spins a build, it should be included. :)
>
> -Toke
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20131225/48131181/attachment-0002.html>