[Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: Re: CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated?
dave.taht at gmail.com
Fri Dec 27 14:15:03 EST 2013
Dear fred: are you sticking with pie? I was going to suggest you try fq
codel with a target 25ms on your outbound. (You are at 800kbit or so as
best I recall?)
On Dec 27, 2013 11:10 AM, "Fred Stratton" <fredstratton at imap.cc> wrote:
> I upgraded to 3.10.24-8 on 2013-12-23.
> I modified /etc/fixdaemons, adding
> /etc/init.d/sqm restart
> input the appropriate sqm settings, transcribed from aqm
> and the build works very well. For ADSL2+ here, it is the best so far.
> On 27/12/13 18:55, Dave Taht wrote:
> A race condition appears to have crept in...
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht at gmail.com>
> Date: Dec 27, 2013 10:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated?
> To: "Richard E. Brown" <richb.hanover at gmail.com>
> Probably didn't start sqm properly
> Restart it by hand via /etc/init.d/sqm restart
> tc -s qdisc show dev ge00
> Should show htb and fq codel.
> On Dec 27, 2013 10:36 AM, "Rich Brown" <richb.hanover at gmail.com> wrote:
>> So I screwed up my courage and replaced my 3.10.18-? firmware in my
>> primary router with 3.10.24-8. That version had worked well as a secondary,
>> so I figured, What the heck… Let’s give it try.
>> The result was not pretty. I set my link speeds in the SQM page, chose
>> the defaults for the Queue Discipline tab, and link layer to ATM with no
>> additional overhead for my DSL link.
>> Ping times to google are normally ~51-54 msec. But when I fired up
>> speedtest.net, they jumped to 1500-2500 msec. Is there something I
>> should look at before reverting? Thanks.
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> Cerowrt-devel mailing listCerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.nethttps://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cerowrt-devel