[Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: Re: CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated?
Fred Stratton
fredstratton at imap.cc
Fri Dec 27 14:20:35 EST 2013
I have been using pie for approximately 3 weeks.
You are correct, in that the outbound speed is about 800 - 900 kb/s.
I shall try what you suggest, but do not know how to express the target
of 25 ms as a configuration option.
On 27/12/13 19:15, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> Dear fred: are you sticking with pie? I was going to suggest you try
> fq codel with a target 25ms on your outbound. (You are at 800kbit or
> so as best I recall?)
>
> On Dec 27, 2013 11:10 AM, "Fred Stratton" <fredstratton at imap.cc> wrote:
>
> I upgraded to 3.10.24-8 on 2013-12-23.
>
> I modified /etc/fixdaemons, adding
> /etc/init.d/sqm restart
>
> input the appropriate sqm settings, transcribed from aqm
>
> rebooted
>
> and the build works very well. For ADSL2+ here, it is the best so far.
>
>
> On 27/12/13 18:55, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> A race condition appears to have crept in...
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht at gmail.com <mailto:dave.taht at gmail.com>>
>> Date: Dec 27, 2013 10:47 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated?
>> To: "Richard E. Brown" <richb.hanover at gmail.com
>> <mailto:richb.hanover at gmail.com>>
>> Cc:
>>
>> Probably didn't start sqm properly
>>
>> Restart it by hand via /etc/init.d/sqm restart
>>
>> tc -s qdisc show dev ge00
>>
>> Should show htb and fq codel.
>>
>> On Dec 27, 2013 10:36 AM, "Rich Brown" <richb.hanover at gmail.com
>> <mailto:richb.hanover at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> So I screwed up my courage and replaced my 3.10.18-? firmware
>> in my primary router with 3.10.24-8. That version had worked
>> well as a secondary, so I figured, What the heck… Let’s give
>> it try.
>>
>> The result was not pretty. I set my link speeds in the SQM
>> page, chose the defaults for the Queue Discipline tab, and
>> link layer to ATM with no additional overhead for my DSL link.
>>
>> Ping times to google are normally ~51-54 msec. But when I
>> fired up speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net>, they jumped to
>> 1500-2500 msec. Is there something I should look at before
>> reverting? Thanks.
>>
>> Rich
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> <mailto:Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20131227/45574c75/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Cerowrt-devel
mailing list