[Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated?/Not anymore...
fredstratton at imap.cc
Fri Dec 27 16:14:53 EST 2013
'Enable', not 'Enabled' checkbox.
On 27/12/13 21:13, Fred Stratton wrote:
> The 'Enabled' checkbox is disabled by default.
> I would have no problem with it being enabled by default, but would
> like it retained.
> I use a TP-Link device to bridge to the phone line. In the next year,
> a build of OpenWRT will appear which I can apply to this, with all the
> ceroWRT changes incorporated in it hopefully.
> I envisage testing the operation of that device as a full gateway, and
> using the ceroWRT device as an access point in the testing period,
> with sqm partly or wholly disabled on it.
> On 27/12/13 20:59, Rich Brown wrote:
>>> Probably didn't start sqm properly
>>> Restart it by hand via /etc/init.d/sqm restart
>>> tc -s qdisc show dev ge00
>>> Should show htb and fq codel.
>> Uh oh. PEBCAK (Problem Exists Between Chair And Keyboard :-)
>> I see the problem... There's this little checkbox in the "Basic
>> Settings" of the GUI... It's labeled "Enable" and hidden in plain
>> sight above all the interesting stuff in that tab. If it isn't
>> checked, the router is just as bloated as every other home router.
>> However, if you *do* check it, everything works as desired. Whew!
>> A few thoughts which might keep this from ever happening again:
>> - Was it disabled by default? (I don't remember unchecking it...)
>> - Is there even a reason to have the "Enable" checkbox? Would there
>> ever be a circumstance where a person wouldn't want SQM?
>> - Could the "Enable" checkbox be replaced by another "Not Enabled"
>> entry in the "Interface name" dropdown?
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cerowrt-devel