[Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.10.24-8 badly bloated?/Not anymore...

[Fred Stratton]

'Enable', not 'Enabled' checkbox.


On 27/12/13 21:13, Fred Stratton wrote:
> The 'Enabled' checkbox is disabled by default.
>
> I would have no problem with it being enabled by default, but would 
> like it retained.
>
> I use a TP-Link device to bridge to the phone line. In the next year, 
> a build of OpenWRT will appear which I can apply to this, with all the 
> ceroWRT changes incorporated in it hopefully.
>
> I envisage testing the operation of that device as a full gateway, and 
> using the ceroWRT device as an access point in the testing period, 
> with sqm partly or wholly disabled on it.
>
>
> On 27/12/13 20:59, Rich Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> Probably didn't start sqm properly
>>>
>>> Restart it by hand via /etc/init.d/sqm restart
>>>
>>> tc -s qdisc show dev ge00
>>>
>>> Should show htb and fq codel.
>>>
>> Uh oh. PEBCAK (Problem Exists Between Chair And Keyboard :-)
>>
>> I see the problem... There's this little checkbox in the "Basic 
>> Settings" of the GUI... It's labeled "Enable" and hidden in plain 
>> sight above all the interesting stuff in that tab. If it isn't 
>> checked, the router is just as bloated as every other home router.
>>
>> However, if you *do* check it, everything works as desired. Whew!
>>
>> A few thoughts which might keep this from ever happening again:
>>
>> - Was it disabled by default? (I don't remember unchecking it...)
>> - Is there even a reason to have the "Enable" checkbox? Would there 
>> ever be a circumstance where a person wouldn't want SQM?
>> - Could the "Enable" checkbox be replaced by another "Not Enabled" 
>> entry in the "Interface name" dropdown?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Rich
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20131227/ce27681b/attachment-0002.html>