[Cerowrt-devel] Anyone using PPPoE with Sugarland?

[William Katsak]

I don't think that the QDISC variable was used in the Sugarland version of the script.

What do you have for IFACE?

Thanks,
-Bill

On Jan 5, 2013, at 5:25 PM, dpreed at reed.com wrote:

> I am using 3.7.1-1, and comparing my simple_qos.sh config with yours, I don't see any QDISC=... line in yours.
> So is it possible you need that?  The egress() interface setup in simple_qos.sh uses that to set the queue discipline.
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "William Katsak" <wkatsak at gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 4:37pm
> To: "cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Anyone using PPPoE with Sugarland?
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am experimenting with using Cero/Sugarland on a PPPoE connection, and can't seem to find a config of simple_qos that works well.
> 
> The service is DSL, PPPoE, 3M/768K. Without any qos, the router works well, as expected. When I try to use simple_qos, the clients have trouble loading websites (hangs while loading, etc).
> 
> Netlyzer shows upstream buffering of about 650ms, consistently. I have tried various higher and lower values for UPLINK and DOWNLINK, but nothing seems to help. Anyway, I think 15-20% below link should be fine.
> 
> Here is my config:
> UPLINK=550
> DOWNLINK=1900
> DEV=ifb0
> IFACE=ge00
> DEPTH=42
> TC=/usr/sbin/tc
> FLOWS=8000
> PERTURB="perturb 0" # Permutation is costly, disable
> FLOWS=16000 # 
> BQL_MAX=3000 # it is important to factor this into the RED calc
> 
> CEIL=$UPLINK
> MTU=1492
> ADSLL=""
> PPOE=yes
> 
> Couple of things I am unsure about:
> 1) Should the IFACE be ge00 or pppoe-ge00?
> 2) Should the MTU be the pppoe mtu (1492) or the ethernet (1500)
> 
> One last thing: I have the lan split up into VLAN interfaces se00.1, se00.100, and se00.200. Everything otherwise works as expected with these, but could the naming be breaking something?
> 
> If anyone is willing to share a working configuration it would be much appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bill Katsak
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20130106/6c27e52f/attachment-0002.html>