[Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.7.2-3 released, still in a battle with ipv6

[Robert Bradley]

I got this working in much the same way as in earlier builds by adding the
following to the top of /etc/dnsmasq.conf and restarting dnsmasq:

enable-ra
dhcp-range=se00,2001:xx:yy:1::2,2001:xx:yy:1::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h
dhcp-range=sw10,2001:xx:yy:2::2,2001:xx:yy:2::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h
dhcp-range=sw00,2001:xx:yy:3::2,2001:xx:yy:3::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h
dhcp-range=gw00,2001:xx:yy:4::2,2001:xx:yy:4::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h
dhcp-range=gw10,2001:xx:yy:5::2,2001:xx:yy:5::ffff:ffff,slaac,48h

I have not tried the new automatic setup yet, but this should get DHCPv6
and RA working regardless.  Clients should be able to use both DHCPv6 and
SLAAC addresses.


On 18 January 2013 15:54, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:

> all:
>
> Could you post the generated dnsmasq.conf file and your network file and
> cc steven barth?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There are multiple threads on the stateless dhcp and dhcp implementation
>> going on here:
>>
>>
>> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2013q1/thread.html
>>
>> among other things, "enable-ra" should be getting set in the generated
>> dnsmasq conf file and probably isn't right now. Perhaps it can be manually
>> set?
>>
>> I'm hoping ipv6 support isn't mission critical for anyone? I really
>> wasn't planning on A) breaking it, or B) fixing it - this week. I DO care
>> about exercising the ipv6 portion of the stack a lot though, there are
>> still a few new instruction traps left to kill in the kernel (see bug 419)
>>
>> (dhcpv6 support also has trouble - can't even assign the delegated prefix)
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Richard Brown <
>> Rich.Brown at intermapper.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Dave, Maciej,
>>>
>>>  On Jan 17, 2013, at 4:47 PM, <
>>> cerowrt-devel-request at lists.bufferbloat.net>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Maciej Soltysiak <maciej at soltysiak.com>
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, I configured he.net tunnel according to
>>>> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 and works with latest 3.7.2-4.
>>>>
>>>> However I don't understand how my client is supposed get an ip6
>>>> address. radvd is gone and I don't see anything handing out me an ip6 addr.
>>>> Who's job is it now then?
>>>>
>>>
>>> dnsmasq is supposed to do the job now, but the configuration via
>>> openwrt's
>>> config is in flux. There is documentation floating about on
>>> dnsmasq-discuss as well as inside the the dnsmasq-2.66test10 tarball on how
>>> to do it at the command line....
>>>
>>>
>>>  I have the same problem with 3.7.2-4: my HE.net connection works fine,
>>> CeroWrt gets the expected global IPv6 addresses, and each of the five
>>> interfaces (not but not the babel ones) get nice routed global addresses
>>> allocated from my /48.
>>>
>>>  But my Mac (using either wired or wireless) doesn't get a v6 address.
>>> Do you have any links to the dnsmasq documentation (a quick google didn't
>>> turn up anything.) Thanks.
>>>
>>>  Rich
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>>
>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
>> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>


-- 
Robert Bradley
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20130118/3fa97922/attachment-0002.html>