[Cerowrt-devel] [homenet] pushing the bird faster
dave.taht at gmail.com
Wed May 8 06:22:36 EDT 2013
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg at iki.fi>wrote:
> On 8.5.2013, at 12.20, Steven Barth <cyrus at openwrt.org> wrote:
> > On 08.05.2013 11:07, Dave Taht wrote:
> >> Unless you wish to maintain these modifications forever, it is helpful
> >> to seek consensus with the mainline developers of these tools to push
> >> your patches in a mutually acceptible form. I would suspect that dnsmasq
> >> and odhcp6c devs would be amiable to a discussion at the very least.
> > Speaking for odhcp6c I have looked into the homenet changes yesterday
> and I don't see it as a big hassle to merge these features into the main
> branch at some point once they have an official IANA number and the specs
> are somewhat stable.
> > Also feel free to contact me if you are thinking about getting anything
> IPv6-related upstream to OpenWrt and we can discuss that or you can of
> course also use the official channels, mailing lists and so on.
> That's underlying problem with both dnsmasq and odhcp6c forked changes -
> we use IOS-specific prefix class option # that is NOT from IANA, and I'd
> rather not see it in wide use for obvious reasons.
I have few problems with IOS setting a default standard, open source
following it, and the IANA blessing it later. :) That said, what is the
status of the IANA application? Link?
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cerowrt-devel