[Cerowrt-devel] an option for a new platform?
dave.taht at gmail.com
Fri Dec 12 09:52:29 EST 2014
There was a review of that hardware that showed it couldn't push more
than 600Mbit natively (without shaping). I felt that the ethernet
driver could be improved significantly after looking it over, but
didn't care for the 600mbit as a starting point to have to improve
Not ruling it out, though! It met quite a few requirements we have.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Erkki Lintunen <ebirdie at iki.fi> wrote:
> while enjoying and reading another thread from the list...
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] how is everyone's uptime?
>> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:42:37 -0800
>> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
>> But frankly, I would prefer for most of the chaos there to subside and to find
>> a new, additional platform, to be working on before resuming work,
>> that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. And
>> to be more openwrt compatible in whatever we do, whatever that is.
> this reminded me that another day I passed a web-page of a platform and
> in the hope this has not been on the list yet passing it forward.
> An interesting tidbit in the platform is the choice of firmware, I
> think. Haven't seen any board yet with the similar choice by the
> manufacturer. With a quick summing from the vendor part catalog, the
> platform is sub 200 EUR (238 USD in current exchange rate) for an about
> working assembly of 3x 1GbE, 4G ram, 1G flash, 802.11a/b/g/n radio...
> I can't say anything how capable the hw might be for the stated inbound
> shaping performance. I have had an ALIX board from their previous
> generation for years and its been humming nicely though I haven't pushed
> it to its envelope.
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
More information about the Cerowrt-devel