[Cerowrt-devel] I've always liked the idea of doing up building-wide networks

[Alijah Ballard]

As I don't watch G+ or Facebook. On the list is prefered.

Thanks for all of the work you have done so far.


On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:46 AM, David Personette <dperson at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I at least liked both the links here on the list.
>
> --
> David P.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ... In particular when it came to getting minimal interference on all
>> the wifi access points. It is better to have fewer, better wifi APs
>> with a co-ordinated channel allocation strategy in an apartment
>> building than everybody installing one willy-nilly.
>>
>> http://www.frankston.com/public/?name=20140717-0146
>>
>> BTW: When I find an interesting link, these days, I tend to just put
>> it on my g+ rather than the email lists, and tend to feel I'm wasting
>> other people's bandwidth by doing it on the list - although sometimes
>> a good discussion is sparked. Should I stop forwarding stuff like this
>> (and the mit paper) to the list?
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>>
>> NSFW:
>> https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20140718/2d017ba1/attachment-0002.html>