[Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: wndr3800 replacement
woody77 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 28 17:01:24 EDT 2014
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr at sandelman.ca>
> > Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
> > > I also think that it'll be very hard to find a box that is decently
> > > priced
> > > that also will do gig speeds *and* will do AQM, since most home
> > > gateways that
> > So, I'm struggling to get a $700 Cisco (not Linksys) SOHO switch to
> > packets at GbE across my home LAN. Gigabit ethernet in the home is
> > a reality.... and having a Gigabit LAN hit a 11Mb/s (half-duplex!)
> > wireless means that in many homes, we actually need a box that satisfies
> > both.
Right, but in that instance, the flow-rates are only 802.11 rates, and a
wndr can keep up with that. It's the sqm on the uplink/wan side that needs
the processing power. Or, it's time to do what Dave has mentioned and
rewrite to get a faster implementation than htb.
> > My vote would be to double the price from $80 to $250, and set that as
> > new base for cerowrt work. If it can't forward more than 2-3 GbE links,
> > that is just fine. I don't expect 24-ports of GbE.
> > (I was expecting that cisco switch to do that... sadly no lost packets
> > on a $100 unmanaged FE switch...)
> I started looking at the edgerouter LTE and related boxes again.
> Does anyone else have one?
> They have a new release based on 3.4 out; backporting fq_codel might work.
> I don't have any numbers on it's performance however, and it does look like
> updating it to 3.10 would be good idea.
Nice looking platform.
Cavium Octeon? Looks like it's all in software, and not in offload modules?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cerowrt-devel