[Cerowrt-devel] Correct syntax for cake commands and atm issues.
Fred Stratton
fredstratton at imap.cc
Fri Jul 10 09:11:57 EDT 2015
I am using the latest version compiled by DT, after you last made this
incompatibility comment on the cake list.
I happen to have compiled separately a build with your changes of 22
days ago incorporated, but based on lupin undisclosed version 2. I shall
try that.
I am making an assumption throughout this that qdiscs should be used on
the WAN side always, effectively before the firewall. Is this assumption
correct?
On 10/07/15 13:57, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> You're already using correct syntax - I've written it to be quite
> lenient and use sensible defaults for missing information. There are
> several sets of keywords and parameters which are mutually orthogonal,
> and don't depend on each other, so "besteffort" has nothing to do with
> "overhead" or "atm".
>
> What's probably happening is that you're using a slightly old version
> of the cake kernel module which lacks the overhead parameter entirely,
> but a more up to date tc which does support it. We've seen this
> combination crop up ourselves recently.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>
More information about the Cerowrt-devel
mailing list