[Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't)

[Dave Taht]

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>>> Mikael, a simple test of the analysis I just did would be to use
>>> ethtool to set your server to 100mbits (ethtool -s
>>> your_ethernet_device advertise 0x008 and turn on fq_codel on both the
>>> client and server.
>>
>>
>> Hm what do you mean by "client" and "server"?

your topology is:

client box - router - server

forcing the router - server link to 100mbit will push the egress
buffering into the router for the rrul_50_up test in particular.

>> Where do you want the queueing to happen? Egress from the WRT1200AC towards
>> the server?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Then setting the WAN port of the WRT1200AC to 100 megabit/s
>> would work, yes.
>
> Yes, but I am unsure from looking at the driver that using ethtool on
> the egress on the wrt1200ac will actually work, but
> pretty sure it will work if you set it on the server. feel free to try both. :)
>
>>
>> --
>> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> worldwide bufferbloat report:
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
> And:
> What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast



-- 
Dave Täht
worldwide bufferbloat report:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
And:
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast