[Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't)
dave.taht at gmail.com
Fri Jun 26 15:13:20 EDT 2015
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se>
>>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
>>>>> Mikael, a simple test of the analysis I just did would be to use
>>>>> ethtool to set your server to 100mbits (ethtool -s
>>>>> your_ethernet_device advertise 0x008 and turn on fq_codel on both the
>>>>> client and server.
>>>> Hm what do you mean by "client" and "server"?
>> your topology is:
>> client box - router - server
>> forcing the router - server link to 100mbit will push the egress
>> buffering into the router for the rrul_50_up test in particular.
> No, my topology is <client - router - switch - server>, that is what made me
> So if I forced the eth0 router-switch link into 100M I will break the
> server->client direction (it'll be shallow buffer fifo) but at least
> client->server direction will exercise fq_codel on the router.
well, maybe the driver will take ethtool on the mvneta. try it. :)
> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
worldwide bufferbloat report:
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
More information about the Cerowrt-devel