[Cerowrt-devel] did a chaos calmer openwrt build, untested
dave.taht at gmail.com
Mon Mar 16 15:19:01 EDT 2015
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Felix Fietkau <nbd at openwrt.org> wrote:
> On 2015-03-16 17:58, Dave Taht wrote:
> > I folded in the following:
> > * minstrel-blues
> As far as I know, this is not really "minstrel-blues", this is a minor
> set of minstrel tweaks.
> > * minstrel patches for minimum variance (hurts udp, helps tcp)
> Is this the same patches that you sent a while back?
> Yes. They did leverage a function call from the above.
> > * babel-1.6.0 release candidate
> > * cake and the usual slew of alternate bufferbloat-fighting qdiscs
> > I intended to use this build to test my ubnt gear and the archer c7v2.
> > It is NOT cerowrt...
> > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/ubnt/ar71xx/
> Where's the source? I can't find it on your github...
One of my goals is to work more closely within openwrt's structures this
I only did that build because half my campus network is breaking on a
regular basis and I have *gotta* fix that.
> 1) But before I even got so far as trying that build, ran across this
> > ticket.
> > https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/19194
> Haven't seen any similar reports from other people yet, might be a
> device specific quirk or broken hw or something, I don't know yet.
> > 2) Is the consensus here we should resume using the "device naming by
> > security model" mode?
> > 3) Things I would like to be developing and then testing
> > * latest dnsmasq code (with fixed date getting stuff to hopefully
> > finally make it up to openwrt)
> > * latest FIB patches backported to 3.18 (or, possibly, moving to 4.0)
> The FIB patches that went into 4.0 are already in OpenWrt trunk ;)
Would like to update the ar71xx code also, if possible?
> - Felix
Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cerowrt-devel