[Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm
alan.christopher.jenkins at gmail.com
Fri Oct 23 13:02:56 EDT 2015
On 23/10/2015, Richard Smith <smithbone at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a shiny new Linksys WRT1900ACS to test.
> I thought it might be nice to start with some comparisons of factory
> firmware vs OpenWRT with sqm enabled.
> So I built and installed an openwrt trunk but the results were very
> non-impressive. Rrul test reported mulit-seconds of latency and it was
> equally non-impressive with sqm enabled or disabled. So I assumed that
> sqm in trunk on this device must not work yet. Then I wondered how well
> sqm in trunk was tested and that perhaps its broken for all devices.
> So I tested openwrt trunk on my Netgear 3700v2 and saw the same results.
> Then I tried openwrt cc and got the same results.
> Finally, I went to the reference implementation: cerowrt 3.10.50-1 on my
> 3700v2. Same results.
> So at this point I'm thinking there's a PEBKAC issue and I'm not really
> turning it on.
> Here's my enable procedure:
> Go the sqm tab in the GUI and set egress and ingress to 10000, set the
> interface to the upstream interface, click enable, click save and
> apply. Everything else is left at default. ie fq_codel and simple.qos.
Your description misses at least one step from the official how-to.
May be worth checking:
Start and Enable the SQM scripts. To do this, choose System → Startup
Click Start to start the SQM process
Click Enable to start the SQM process when the route reboots
The how-to is here: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/sqm
The original qos-scripts definitely required that step. IIRC, it's an
openwrt convention that installing a package doesn't automatically
enable its startup script. However this wasn't strictly necessary for
at least some drafts of the sqm code. I don't know if the current
version needs it or not.
> I've also tried a reboot after enabling those settings and then gone
> back to the gui to verify they were still set.
> My test setup:
> I run netperf-wrapper -H Server -l 30 rrul and look at the 'totals' or
> 'all' plot.
> If I run the above with this setup.
> Then I get the expected 800-900Mbit/s with latencies < 15ms. So I don't
> think there's a problem with my test infrastructure.
> What am I missing and or what's the next step in figuring out whats wrong?
> Richard A. Smith
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>> A: Top-posting.
>>> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
More information about the Cerowrt-devel