[Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: License File for Open Source Repositories

[Marc Petit-Huguenin]

On 12/23/2016 08:05 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I have no idea what they are trying to do.

This is to prevent people to propose text to be included in a specification without disclosing that this may be relevant to a patent or patent application they own or know about.  As soon you make a contribution, you are supposed to disclose such IPR in the IETF database.  This text makes it explicit that anything done in such repository is covered by the same requirements.

An alternative would have been a variant of the Signed-off-by header, but as the repository does not extend to the RFC-editor or the IETF Trust, that's, the best that can be done for now.

> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary at ietf.org>
> Date: Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 7:36 AM
> Subject: License File for Open Source Repositories
> To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce at ietf.org>
> Cc: iesg at ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org
> 
> 
> The IESG has observed that many working groups work with open source
> repositories even for their work on specifications. That's great, and
> we're happy to see this development, as it fits well the working style
> of at least some of our working groups. This style is also likely to be
> more popular in the future.
> 
> As always, we'd like to understand areas where we can either be helpful
> in bringing in some new things such as tooling, or where we need to
> integrate better between the repository world and the IETF process. As
> an example of the latter, we're wondering whether it would be helpful to
> have a standard boilerplate for these repositories with respect to the
> usual copyright and other matters. The intent is for such text to be
> placed in a suitable file (e.g., "CONTRIBUTING"), probably along with
> some additional information that is already present in these files in
> many repositories. The idea is that people should treat, e.g., text
> contributions to a draft-foo.xml in a repository much in the same way as
> they treat text contributions on the list, at least when it comes to
> copyright, IPR, and other similar issues.
> 
> We have worked together with the IETF legal team and few key experts
> from the IETF who are actively using these repositories, and suggest the
> following text.
> 
> We're looking to make a decision on this matter on our January 19th,
> 2017 IESG Telechat, and would appreciate feedback before then. This
> message will be resent after the holiday period is over to make sure it
> is noticed. Please send comments to the IESG (iesg at ietf.org) by 2017-01-17.
> 
> The IESG
> 
> ——
> 
> This repository relates to activities in the Internet Engineering Task
> Force(IETF). All material in this repository is considered Contributions
> to the IETF Standards Process, as defined in the intellectual property
> policies of IETF currently designated as BCP 78
> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp78), BCP 79
> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp79) and the IETF Trust Legal
> Provisions (TLP) Relating to IETF Documents
> (http://trustee.ietf.org/trust-legal-provisions.html).
> 
> Any edit, commit, pull-request, comment or other change made to this
> repository constitutes Contributions to the IETF Standards Process. You
> agree to comply with all applicable IETF policies and procedures,
> including, BCP 78, 79, the TLP, and the TLP rules regarding code
> components (e.g. being subject to a Simplified BSD License) in
> Contributions.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc at petit-huguenin.org
Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20161223/fe46bfb1/attachment.sig>