[Cerowrt-devel] [LEDE-DEV] lede integration issues remaining from the detrius of cerowrt

[Rosen Penev]

E: current fdisk versions support GPT. g must be used instead of o in order
to create it. from what i've seen, both tools work the same(2048 sector
padding, etc...) for GPT.

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:46 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:

> happy to see cake working today! thx all!
>
> In https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10:
>
> A) We have flent's tc-iterate.c as a fast, lightweight means of
> polling fq_codel, pie, cake stats (as the shell in openwrt doesn't
> support a subsecond sleep) for openwrt.
>
> (However this package and code is in need of iteration to support
> polling the new stats presented in the fq_codel for wifi sysfs code.)
>
> Having something like this working is essential to analyze the real
> performance and correctness of the new implementations on the low end
> hardware.
>
> B) I am probably the only user of the gnugol package. :(
>
> C) I really need to sync the isochronous code with what avery has upstream
>
> D) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/nanom5poe
>
> I don't know what landed upstream to control poe for the nano-m5
> radios, if anything?
>
> E) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/gdisk
>
> The principal problem with fdisk nowadays is that very large (> 2TB, I
> think) devices are not supported by it, and require a GPT capable
> tool. Is there a replacement in lede that handles GPT? If not - this
> is an old gdisk port to openwrt that I used to use.
>
> F)
> https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/cerowrt-scripts
> was a tool we used to measure latency under load directly on the
> router...
>
> some other packages that might be worth upstreaming, or putting in
> another repo or updating in ceropackages
>
> owamp: lets us measure ping times very precisely. (requires good ntp)
> ntpsec - a vastly hardened full fledged ntp fork https://www.ntpsec.org/
> scamper - two other measurement tools
> shaperprobe
>
> ?
>
> G) We used lighttpd in cerowrt as it was tons faster than uhttpd and
> flexible enough to also do local web serving. can it (or ngnix) be
> substituted for uhttpd? Or has uhttpd got faster?
>
> H) Anyone working on go or rust for lede? hugo and ipfs and all the
> other blockchain related distributed web bits looks like fun...
>
> It looks like the static linking in go is a deal-killer
>
> https://github.com/GeertJohan/openwrt-go/issues/2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20160611/ab07cd88/attachment-0001.html>