[Bloat] ntia broadband RFC
Jason_Livingood at comcast.com
Thu Jan 20 10:11:10 EST 2022
In my personal opinion, these agencies are usually quite happy to have comments from technical experts. If any of you do make comments, making them concise and not too complex will tend to ensure they are widely read and internalized. ;-)
In the details, I could certainly see folks in this community being able to credibly comment on question 13  given its mention of latency and quality.
 "What guidance or requirements, if any, should NTIA consider with respect to network
reliability and availability, cybersecurity, resiliency, latency, or other service quality features and
metrics? What criteria should NTIA establish to assess grant recipients’ plans to ensure that service providers maintain and/or exceed thresholds for reliability, quality of service, sustainability, upgradability and other required service characteristics?"
On 1/18/22, 16:19, "Bloat on behalf of Dave Taht" <bloat-bounces at lists.bufferbloat.net on behalf of dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
This is the first time in years that I felt that maybe something we
said could get through to an agency of the US government. The deadline
for filing is feb 4th,
and it would be nice if some of the billions on the table got spent on
better routers, software, and networks.
In their RFC there are 36 questions, some of which are pretty good.
I've been participating a bit in this forum:
among other things I dragged out last week was the "upgrade in place"
idea. There's 3 weeks or so to come up with
something worth filing, but as usual these days I'm always looking for
I tried to build a better future, a few times:
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
Bloat mailing list
Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
More information about the Cerowrt-devel