[Codel] missing part of section 6.2 of draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-02, (Kathleen Nichols)

[David Collier-Brown]

On 03/12/2014 04:23 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2014 1:11 PM, "David Collier-Brown" <davec-b at rogers.com
> <mailto:davec-b at rogers.com>> wrote:
> >
> > [Off-topic]
> > Someone with classic-typesetting-tools experience might wish to
> > volunteer a pandoc-based process. See, for example,
> > http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/589196/0e8f212d7a59f556/
>
> The fq codel rfc was written in pandoc, and converted via pandoc2rfc.
> The raw texts are managed in git and in github.
>
> It took me a year of fiddling to get to acceptable output from this.
>
> The amount of effort required was comparable to getting a paper
> formatted for the IEEE with TeX, with far less pleasing results than TeX.
>
> Certainly you have to be committed if you want to write an rfc. The
> present process is a major barrier to entry.
>
> >
> >  --dave
>



AARGH!

I wasn't expecting that...

--dave





-- 
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb at spamcop.net           |                      -- Mark Twain

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel/attachments/20140312/5689d5bd/attachment-0002.html>