[Ecn-sane] robustness against attack?
Sebastian Moeller
moeller0 at gmx.de
Mon Mar 25 05:40:42 EDT 2019
Hi Jonathan,
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 09:53, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 25 Mar, 2019, at 9:34 am, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If you'll recall, my initial workaround was simply to
>
> …not implement SCE on single-queue middleboxes, and rely on the known-good CE response in that case.
Which reduces the problem to get middle-boxes to use ECN at all ;)
> But if we can show that putting SCE there too is safe, that's even better.
Given that the above might be harder than desired, it might be a good idea to immediately aim a bit higher than pure-CE ECN.
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>
More information about the Ecn-sane
mailing list