[Make-wifi-fast] hacking on the candelatech and qca ath10k firmware

Aaron Wood woody77 at gmail.com
Thu May 5 13:05:51 EDT 2016

I think you might be mis-reading the box-plots as error-bars (since their
quartile plots).  I'll need to crunch the numbers, but I'm pretty sure that
the fq results are going to show a higher median throughput (and lower
median latency), with a fair bit of significance.  I'll see if I can figure
out how to calculate the SD of the mean (and other quartiles) from the
flent output (I have scripts that can do this for iperf3's json output).


On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:

> see: http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/ath10_ath9k_1/
> the regular qca firmware survived the rrul better, and seemed to do
> wmm better. (CS6 for example, was fine) Aside from that it was slower
> and more jittery than the candelatech firmware. some pics there. Am
> too tired to write it up right now.
> https://github.com/dtaht/blog-cerowrt/tree/master/content/flent/qca-10.2
> I guess I gotta go boot into baseline kernels now and pray I haven't
> been deluding myself at these speeds. For all I know everything is
> actually better with those than all these patches.
> night
> --
> Dave Täht
> Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
> http://blog.cerowrt.org
> _______________________________________________
> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> Make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/make-wifi-fast/attachments/20160505/9d91df5d/attachment.html>

More information about the Make-wifi-fast mailing list