[Make-wifi-fast] flent adds more text output
Dave Taht
dave.taht at gmail.com
Sun Nov 20 08:49:56 EST 2016
nope.
root at dancer:~/uap# ./long.sh
Data file written to
./rrul_be-2016-11-20T053621.542683.long_bbr_dense_airtime_9_ath9k_archer_c2.flent.gz.
Summary of rrul_be test run 'long-bbr-dense-airtime-9-ath9k-archer-c2'
(at 2016-11-20 13:36:21.542683):
avg / median loss
Ping (ms) ICMP : 30.91 / 30.91 ms -0.29 %
Ping (ms) UDP BE1 : 86.81 / 86.81 ms 0.00 %
Ping (ms) UDP BE2 : 186.92 / 186.92 ms 0.00 %
Ping (ms) UDP BE3 : 123.76 / 123.76 ms 0.00 %
Ping (ms) avg : 132.49 / 132.49 ms 0.00 %
TCP download BE : 8.89 / 8.89 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP download BE2 : 8.99 / 8.99 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP download BE3 : 8.85 / 8.85 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP download BE4 : 8.90 / 8.90 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP download avg : 8.91 / 8.91 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP download sum : 35.63 / 35.63 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP totals : 41.29 / 41.29 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP upload BE : 1.41 / 1.41 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP upload BE2 : 1.42 / 1.42 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP upload BE3 : 1.42 / 1.42 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP upload BE4 : 1.41 / 1.41 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP upload avg : 1.42 / 1.42 Mbits/s 0.00 %
TCP upload sum : 5.66 / 5.66 Mbits/s 0.00 %
Data file written to
./tcp_ndown-2016-11-20T054204.988641.long_bbr_dense_airtime_9_ath9k_archer_c2_flows_1.flent.gz.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk> wrote:
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk> writes:
>
>> Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I am not convinced the text output is actually correct - see attached graph.
>>>
>>> I am testing airtime fairness code on both an archer ap and ubuntu box
>>> on the ath9k, and the udp flows show a peak of 80ms on the plot and a
>>> median of 25ms on the ping, where...
>>
>> The summary output formatter doesn't discard null data points before
>> computing the median. Guessing that's the reason for the discrepancy...
>
> Added filtering to data series before computing the median, and a new
> column that shows the loss as a percent of data points filtered out.
> Probably going to get in trouble for calling it loss, since it does not
> correspond to packet loss (except for ICMP flows), just to lost data
> points; not actually sure it's a good idea to have it in there...
>
> -Toke
--
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rrul_be-2016-11-20T053621.542683.long_bbr_dense_airtime_9_ath9k_archer_c2.flent.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 1173150 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/make-wifi-fast/attachments/20161120/b5b44851/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the Make-wifi-fast
mailing list