[NNagain] On "Throttling" behaviors

[dan]

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 12:10 PM Frantisek Borsik via Nnagain <
nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

> Bob - *"beyond FWA which is limited by physics and is energy inefficient,
> a net negative to climate mitigations"* - why FWA should be energy
> inefficient and net negative to climate mitigation?
>
> I know that I'm drifting this conversation off again, but I strongly
> disagree with this statement.
>
>
100%.   Some of this group may be sick of seeing my solar builds in the
matrix chat...   we're running FWA radios that run 3-9W, less power than a
typical cable modem or ONU.  We're running sites with hundreds of customers
burning up 100W on solar power.   We've built 2 new sites this week running
entirely on solar power.  I don't know how much greener you get...  We
don't even run generators there, just add more solar so we can run the site
on overcast production.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/nnagain/attachments/20231003/0143022c/attachment.html>