[Rpm] Alternate definitions of "working condition" - unnecessary?

[Rich Brown]

A portion of yesterday's RPM call encouraged people to come up with new definitions of "working conditions".

This feels like a red herring. 

We already have two worst-case definitions - with implementations - of tools that "stuff up" a network. Flent and Apple's RPM Tool drive a network into worst-case behavior for long (> 60 seconds) and medium (~20 seconds) terms.

What new information would another "working conditions" test expose that doesn't already come from Flent/RPM Tool? Thanks.

Rich