[Rpm] [Starlink] LUL 220ms flat over starlink

[Bjørn Ivar Teigen]

Seems the GeoIP was wrong this time. Interesting to follow though! And also
interesting that the LUL is so close to the idle latency.

[image: image.png]

- Bjørn Ivar


On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 17:26, Mike Puchol via Starlink <
starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

> The status of ISL has improved considerably over the last two months. It
> is now totally feasible to use in-plane (shown in my simulation, blue
> lines) and cross-plane (not yet shown, but in use by the constellation) to
> deliver traffic from Kyiv to Seattle:
>
>
> Best,
>
> Mike
> On Aug 2, 2022, 17:17 +0200, Brennen Smith via Starlink <
> starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net>, wrote:
>
> Compared to GEO Sat links, this is very reasonable latency and distance.
>
> Either GeoIP is wrong, or they’re starting to balance within the mesh for
> capacity. If you look very closely at the maritime announcement - they’re
> right on schedule for the latter.
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 07:41 Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It is my guess over a path this (inaccurately selected? lasered?)
>> long, the new speedtest doesn't saturate the link.
>>
>> https://twitter.com/olegkutkov/status/1554404854763819008
>>
>> --
>> FQ World Domination pending:
>> https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
>> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
>>
> --
>
> Brennen Smith VP Technology
>
> (206) 739-0807 | brennen at ookla.com
>
> linkedin.com/in/brennensmith <https://www.linkedin.com/in/brennensmith/>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------
> This email, its contents and attachments contain information from Ziff
> Davis, Inc. and/or its affiliates which may be privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for
> the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy,
> distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you
> have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email
> and delete the original message and any copies.
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>


-- 
Bjørn Ivar Teigen
Head of Research
+47 47335952 | bjorn at domos.no <name at domos.no> | www.domos.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/rpm/attachments/20220803/be5c0a2d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Attachment.png
Type: image/png
Size: 193791 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/rpm/attachments/20220803/be5c0a2d/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 83244 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/rpm/attachments/20220803/be5c0a2d/attachment-0003.png>