[Starlink] Network quality for rocket scientists

[Bjørn Ivar Teigen]

Thanks Dave, appreciate the feedback!

Sorry to not mention fair queuing explicitly here (I did link people to
bufferbloat.net though! Don't know if that makes up for it).
I agree it solves the bulk of these problems.

/Bjørn Ivar

On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 15:30, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:

> It is wonderful to see another take on this subject from another
> perspective!
>
> Only nit is at the conclusion... the benefits of applying fair queuing
> to level out apparent jitter is well demonstrated at this point, for
> most kinds of traffic. Wish you'd mentioned it.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 7:07 AM Bjørn Ivar Teigen <bjorn at domos.no> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I was inspired by the latest Starship presentation to write a piece on
> network quality in the language of rocket science. The blog can be found
> here:
> https://www.domos.no/news-updates/network-quality-for-rocket-scientists
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Bjørn Ivar Teigen
> >
> > --
> > Bjørn Ivar Teigen
> > Head of Research
> > +47 47335952 | bjorn at domos.no | www.domos.no
> > WiFi Slicing by Domos
> > _______________________________________________
> > Starlink mailing list
> > Starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
>
>
> --
> I tried to build a better future, a few times:
> https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
>
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
>


-- 
Bjørn Ivar Teigen
Head of Research
+47 47335952 | bjorn at domos.no <name at domos.no> | www.domos.no
WiFi Slicing by Domos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20220214/d54c10d4/attachment.html>