[Starlink] Hello List
Omer Shapira
omer.shapira at gmail.com
Sat Mar 19 17:42:16 EDT 2022
> On Mar 2, 2022, at 12:05 PM, Dave Täht <davet at teklibre.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:55:26PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>
>> <tom at evslin.com <mailto:tom at evslin.com>> wrote:
>>> need to prosper in the hybrid digital world. As all of you know, QoS is much
>>> more than up and downlink speed and tough-to-quantify jitter is a huge part
>>> of it. My measurement tool zoomready (at freecheckip.com <http://freecheckip.com/>
>>> <http://freecheckip.com/ <http://freecheckip.com/>> and https://github.com/tevslin/zoomready <https://github.com/tevslin/zoomready>) makes
>>> a more or less continuous measurement of jitter but is quite crude; so
>>
>> I think that Apple/Stuart did a good job inverting the jitter metric, and calling it
>> Rounds/Revolutions per Minute. I suggest doing the same in your tool.
>
> Except it's NOT a jitter metric. It is a latency under load metric primarily aime
> at testing in-band (http 2.0 or quic) AQM latency. Most of our other tests
> to date have a tendency to favor FQ measurements.
Thanks Dave,
FWIW, the RPM metric is outlined in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-responsiveness/
>
> Certainly jitter can be pulled out of detailed measurements using some
> of the proposed methodologies. See the rpm at lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:rpm at lists.bufferbloat.net> list
> an archives for more details.
>
> We have a regular meeting on implementations and new data
> at 10AM PDT tuesdays if anyone would like to join.
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
>> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
>> ] mcr at sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
>>
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net>
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20220319/fbd5e67e/attachment.html>
More information about the Starlink
mailing list