[Starlink] APNIC56 last week

[Noel Butler]

On 25/09/2023 04:30, Michael Richardson wrote:

>> FUD they came out with in mid 90's about IPv4's imminent demise giving
> 
> I think you malign Geoff to no purpose.
> 
> Geoff Houston is brilliant in putting up well thought out strawmans
> (strawmen? Strawpeople?), often with the goal of cristalizing what 
> exactly we don't like about them.

So, we only use the facts that suite our arguments?

Only way to make informed decisions is to consider all aspects, even the 
ones we cover our eyes with, you know, can't see it so it isn't 
happening type ones :)

>> It's also like the local water board here who last week came out 
>> saying a
>> whopping 70% of people surveyed said they'd drink recycled water, of 
>> course
>> it was the local water board that conducted this alleged survey, 
>> because >90%
>> of the more independent polling shows a totally different story.
> 
> I've never seen such independent polling.  I've seen water bottle 
> company polls :-)

The water board in Queensland Australia did just that, countered by 
media polling, now, and over the past 10 years.

> If you think IPv4 is fine, then Geoff's architecture, with 0.0.0.0/1 
> being for
> eyeballs NAT44, 128.0.0.0/3 for institutions and SDN and class C being
> swamp/infrastructure should work just fine.  The question is how to get
> there.

Please quote my post where I said ipv4 is fine, I don't seem to have it 
in sent mail, and if it was all okie dokie, I wouldn't have been running 
ipv6 myself for past 10½ years ;)

-- 
Regards,
Noel Butler

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged 
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to 
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate 
this message without the authors express written authority to do so.   
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then 
delete all copies of this message including attachments immediately. 
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost 
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20230925/b26164af/attachment.html>